THE ANUS ONUS
--Who's anus is God's onus on? (or Icke: who's head is up whose arse now?)
Objectively speaking, it cannot be said that white male homophobia initiated the emerging hate reaction this "gay marriage" legislation is justifiably arousing. Things were going along pretty good, though unfortunately marred by sad cases of hate crime, matched by cases of 'false flag', fake-hate crime. Then the full body press was put on in June, following up Obama's disclosing his birth certificate and dispatching Bin Ladin, if either is true. Cuomo's boys cut a deal with rich "gay" friendly Republicans to pay off the swing votes; while H. Clinton is saluting "Gays and Lesbians in Foreign Affairs Agencies, a group that includes employees of the State Department, the U.S. Agency for International Development and other federal offices that deal with foreign policy", saying "The historic vote in New York ... I think gives such visibility and credibility to everything that so many of you have done for so many years." This is compatible with her advocating cliques and 'special interest' networks inside government agencies, which would surely be illegal, and if not ought to be
{. http://www.pressconnects.com/article/20110627/NEWS01/106270319/Clinton-hails-NY-legalization-gay-marriage?odyssey=mod|newswell|text|FRONTPAGE|s THE SHILL IS ON
Clinton hails NY legalization of gay marriage}
And on Dark Friday, 6.24, Andrew Cuomo signed the homosexual marriage bill into NY State law.
In broader succinct terms, what has happened is this.
Psychohistorically, in response to the sense of being persecuted as a group for what they are by what they do, those who have lived out and promote the homosexual lifestyle "came out of the closet,' launched a full Monty propaganda offensive, and rammed it through our legislature. "Get over it" is their backhand slap at "homophobic"'s visceral reaction. "We all love each other, remember? America?" all that.
But as the old West Texas cowpasture hand put it in different context: they ripped their britches jumping over that barbed wire fence this time. This one's up Cuomo's, Donna Lupardo, Democrats, turncoat Republican politicians, and the public's deriere. Tom Libous and I, for two, point to their situation and shame. Let God OR man be judge, and let it be settled forever
Thursday, June 30, 2011
Thursday, June 9, 2011
Wanging It
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/06/08/anthony-weiner-penis-photo_n_873182.html
Jon Stewart's relevant disinformation
(Mix-mismatching text and tokens)
(->part of the snakebrain show -- brothers under the skin, Jon & Tony: head of hair, hair of head -- the nitrous oxide code).
What is being seen and experienced in the A. Weiner affair is phenomenal sex-power depravity, rivalled in scale of assault on human sensitivity only by penis worship in old Rome, where images of the master's cock could be seen carved over ornate doors. In the psychohistorical context of today's America, it's not just corporate culture-ism feeding off penis shock heheh, it's the deconstruction of what Freud identified as 'penis envy', deepest unconscious sexual fantasy of the female psyche, developmentally following birth trauma. This is slyly addressed by Stewart's interview with "Christian Shaw", who pertly reports it isn't the visual imagery that turns 'em on (she would know; looks Jewish herself). Something else -- though some may 'got it', she coyly intimates. "We don't need to see your thing," she sweetly says. Women's bodies are inherently beautiful; men's appear pre-mammalian.
Psychodynamically, this is an event deconstructing the female-homosexual side of human personality. I claim this could be verified by the number of women vs. men who looked up the picture; 10 to 1 the women would carry the day. Of males who did, the relevant breakdown is ratio of homosexuals to non-homosexuals. Simple curiosity, hardly prurience, would prompt many to want to see what the fuss was about and everybody was looking at. It doesn't entail unconscious wish fulfilment to motivate. To feel compulsion NOT to look at it, maybe revulsion if done so anyway, is a form of 'gaynxiety'. Of course Jon's interviewee, "Christian", won't-can't (even if she thought it) confess to penis envy, although featuring the Jewish-looking girl's 'take' is what it's all about, which is why the Dailey show set it up as they did. Homosexuals certainly understand the visual thing, why Mr. Weiner's 'look at me!' compulsion took the form that it did. It is visual imagery that most inflames their imagination, according to some. Like "penis envy" is nothing strange; its what they've got. This narcissm matches that of Beautiful Body females, and would have been internalized by mothers' loving touch and care, split off and sublimated in normal development. Weiner and his weiner -- how perfect is that for Double text token; squared by his Brooklyn Jewish political identity. Staged by/in/for the Collective Unconscious to fulfill the desire of these overlapping psychic sectors today, dominated by Killer Motherland America. Real maleness is shoved aside, like holy matrimony by same-sexers.
What does Anthony Weiner say to his own mother? What does he say back?
Segue to: Anna Nicole Smith, Michangelo's Pieta.
Jon Stewart's relevant disinformation
(Mix-mismatching text and tokens)
(->part of the snakebrain show -- brothers under the skin, Jon & Tony: head of hair, hair of head -- the nitrous oxide code).
What is being seen and experienced in the A. Weiner affair is phenomenal sex-power depravity, rivalled in scale of assault on human sensitivity only by penis worship in old Rome, where images of the master's cock could be seen carved over ornate doors. In the psychohistorical context of today's America, it's not just corporate culture-ism feeding off penis shock heheh, it's the deconstruction of what Freud identified as 'penis envy', deepest unconscious sexual fantasy of the female psyche, developmentally following birth trauma. This is slyly addressed by Stewart's interview with "Christian Shaw", who pertly reports it isn't the visual imagery that turns 'em on (she would know; looks Jewish herself). Something else -- though some may 'got it', she coyly intimates. "We don't need to see your thing," she sweetly says. Women's bodies are inherently beautiful; men's appear pre-mammalian.
Psychodynamically, this is an event deconstructing the female-homosexual side of human personality. I claim this could be verified by the number of women vs. men who looked up the picture; 10 to 1 the women would carry the day. Of males who did, the relevant breakdown is ratio of homosexuals to non-homosexuals. Simple curiosity, hardly prurience, would prompt many to want to see what the fuss was about and everybody was looking at. It doesn't entail unconscious wish fulfilment to motivate. To feel compulsion NOT to look at it, maybe revulsion if done so anyway, is a form of 'gaynxiety'. Of course Jon's interviewee, "Christian", won't-can't (even if she thought it) confess to penis envy, although featuring the Jewish-looking girl's 'take' is what it's all about, which is why the Dailey show set it up as they did. Homosexuals certainly understand the visual thing, why Mr. Weiner's 'look at me!' compulsion took the form that it did. It is visual imagery that most inflames their imagination, according to some. Like "penis envy" is nothing strange; its what they've got. This narcissm matches that of Beautiful Body females, and would have been internalized by mothers' loving touch and care, split off and sublimated in normal development. Weiner and his weiner -- how perfect is that for Double text token; squared by his Brooklyn Jewish political identity. Staged by/in/for the Collective Unconscious to fulfill the desire of these overlapping psychic sectors today, dominated by Killer Motherland America. Real maleness is shoved aside, like holy matrimony by same-sexers.
What does Anthony Weiner say to his own mother? What does he say back?
Segue to: Anna Nicole Smith, Michangelo's Pieta.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)