I S IS ISIS
Q. What rules of use give this what meaning?
1. repetition of spatial synthesis: cancelling gaps thrice, by reading from left to right as if it* were making an assertion. ("on first reading", by habit; it is almost impossible for an English speaker not to perceive the line of letters this way) This synthesis is by spelling rules.
2. double semiotic synthesis: A. of letters to make words; B. of words to make sentences. The synthesis is by rules of grammar, the first synthesis posits the mentally constructed subject term ("I S IS -)as a given unity (intra-psychic predicating on predications); the second synthesis uses the meanings given by the first, and ends with a grammatical proper name having symbolic reference, in ancient Egypt, to the star Sirius.
3. psychodynamic transform: linking syntheses 1 and 2. is the locutionary force added to the words meanings by the 'crypto-assertion' -- as if communicating a meaning of its own at a still higher level of conscious content.
4. psychosemiotic feedback of assertion Squared: truth-telling in sign-use links consciousness to earth's alter-sun Sirius. If this is pondered by the soul-brain (Isis is also the sister of Osiris), it converts, by matching with unconscious fantasy tokens from the fetal origins of experience, into blessings from the sky for willingness to Square The Truth
I take these steps as a template for constructing other psychosemiotic assertions from sign-use, namely:
.
7 77 777
1. Reading from left to right, cancelling gaps.
2. natural number sign 7 (rules of use in the counting number series: 1,2,3,4,5,6,(7),8,9, whose arithemetic relationships determine its grammar (i.e., as a number sign in equations and other functions).
3. double token synthesizes "the seventy seventh number" as a unique meaning, taking the given syntheses forward, (7 x 10) + 7
= 77.
4. Repeat power of ten: ((7 x 10) x 10) +7 = 777 (the seven hundred and seventy seventh number)
INTERPRETATION
The symbolic reference of 777 is completion of the totality left incomplete by 666, conventionally taken as "mark of the beast".
TEXT-TOKEN SQUARES
If 7 is the token level of theology ("God" =the completing totality), and 6 is the token level of philosophy (totality of Sign-use), then
7 7 = God Squaring (itself) on experienced reality
6 6 = philosophy Squaring itself on Reason
(5 5 = I Squaring itself on consciousness)
(4 4 = (my Acts) Squaring themselves with morality (from reason and natural law)
(3 3 = body in motion - Squared on perceptual processing with words in deliberate, self-aware, voluntary, meaningful motion (ex.: taking a sip of tea: any communicated mind-body/idea-impulse process leading to actual directed motility.
(22 Phenomenal Quality (peripherial sense organ)/Qualia )feeling-state intensities)
(1 1 Psychic / Bio-neural energy split at birth (psy and phi -- the bio-neuro-psychic totality given at birth) SQUARED BY
"ONE" (<- the unity token)
***
WHY UNIQUE SYMBOLIC REFERENCE (as in "GOD") IS NECESSARY IN A DEMOCRACY
-to provide a token identity for group-S* predications (<=required as "we" bond so voters can leave differences at the polls). If there is no over-arching trans-textual assumption of unity -- "something we are all doing in the same spirit"; otherwise unspoken, except in action -- there can be no normality to which to return. In Reich's terms, the "democratic process", so called, becomes perpetual collective pre-ejaculatory orgasmic arousal (4 hour erection on Chialis) with NO RELEASE IN SIGHT ! (deMause: elections are "wars", i.e., domestic, vs foreign child sacrifice rituals -- now, perpetually both, in the "war on terror" => "war of civilizations".
-Provides focus for unconscious group-fantasy of "national unity as siblings sharing the same womb-surround with Mysterious
WHOLLY OTHER (<= placenta =>afterbirth: "God" <= token of Completing Totality). This shared content, which develops in later stages of pregnancy into a regular drama, with rhythms of antagonism (<- discomfort, an-oxygenic) to blissful-consonance (<-expanding movement, oxygenated blood), forming an imprint "sealed by trauma" at birth; climaxed in the process of "cutting loose"/drawing first breath .... (this shared content) is the functional base of all conscious political alignments. Whatever system of sign use ("psychosemiotic regime") comes to rule the discourse will have done so by organizing these original processes. Whatever is reproduced will be reproduced through them.
In America
THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
<= words " I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE...to the flag .....under God"
=> Flags are placentas <=
The placental organ
lining the mother
all-surroundsound
blood-pumping Other
This act with all 3 brains particpating provides a moment of token identity for further group-S* ("we")
predications. These, in turn, are required as "we" bond, so voters can "leave their differences at the polls". If there is no over-arching trans-textual assumption of unity -- "something we are all doing in the same spirit"; otherwise unspoken, except in action -- there can be no normality to which to return after casting the ballot.
In Reich's terms, the "democratic process", so called, becomes perpetual collective pre-ejaculatory orgasmic arousal (4 hour erection on Chialis) with NO RELEASE IN SIGHT !
<= in gesture
-right hand movement connecting salute to flag to pressing heart. This gesture enacts connection between: brain 1, taking in perception of the flag; brain 2, adding reaction to the perceived object as "flag"; brain 3, Squaring reaction to the flag as flag on/by the birth-death feeling state
THE GESTURE SQUARES THE WORDS
EXTERNAL (TEXTUAL) / INTERNAL (TOKEN) BOND = I S IS ISIS
Sunday, July 31, 2011
Saturday, July 23, 2011
LEFT AT THE ALTAR TWICE -- SHARED SACRIFICE
BREAKDOWN OF 7 GROUP-FANTASY TOKENS
SAME - SEX =/= MARRIAGE
<= narrative predicated on addiction to love -eating up your brain by over-loading all pivot-control Stopenders; forced ritualization of sex-love expression by those aggressively defending against sex-guilt/repugnance unconsciousle aimed at them.
TO CLEANSE THE PSYCHE
How coincidental is it ? that push has come to shove over the debt-deficit monetary crisis, on which America's longterm economic future pivots ... at the same time New York's Marriage Equality Act goes into effect. (=> plus these 5 other tokens, below, lying in the immediate foreground of the unconscious background.)
The unconscious psychohistorical aim
is eradication of all guilt-revulsion toward sex and sexuality in general. The deepest two layers of the unconscious background are: 1. birth (<-trauma, rebirth, treated elsewhere). 2. Oedipal stage of personality development, distributing pre-sexual love-cathexis toward/between parents; resulting in choices* later sealed by repression of the opposite, in communicating with others. This is the repressed content, going back to early childhood fears, infatuations and fantasies, that returns when conscious stress brings psychic regression. What we "go back to" (or comes back to us, in altered state) is "where we once began". Amygdalan memory links snake-to-soul brains continuing marsupial- mammals evolution (elephant memory: various animal species remember abusive or rewarding treatment and bond to, or in defense against, repetitions. Freud's instinct theory intersects here, because the amygdala will carry the earliest-formed, most enduring psycho-neural transformation, 'sealed under trauma'; that is, "first love" discharges of libido. Hippocampal memory, relating content mediated by learned sign-use,
"LEFT AT THE ALTAR ...TWICE"
-Dominating the flow of political/historical Group Process 7.22.'11
1. Debt-debit -- (pivoting on: "trickle down" economics -- THE DETAILS OF SACRIFICE)
7.23.11 - BOEHNER breaks off budget discussions with WH*
-- great MSM bleeping about "Tea Party" influence (<-constructed politicasl control tokening =>-layers of psychohistorical process => layers of sign-use: : Scott Monroe - "News and Blues" pre-'08. )
*betokens: cancellation of possibility of sharing assumptions allowing communication to be directed to a common goal. Timing: after passage of NYMEA, 2 days before implementation 7.24. Symbolism:
(OBAMA*)'s position: "left at the alter/altar twice (split/spin)" / Square / "shared sacrifice" / Square) / "same-sex marriage" (<= America's alter at the altar; same-sex marriage pre-emptively foregoes reproduction by sexual intercourse)
http://www.amazon.com/Addicted-Love-Wedding-Veil-Wishes/dp/0446502049
Product Description
Growing up in Valentine, Texas, can make anyone believe in happily ever after. But newly declared recovering romantic Rachael Henderson has decided that love stinks. After having not one but two grooms ditch her at the altar, she announces her disenchantment in an uncharacteristic act of rebellion. She feels liberated...until she's arrested by Sheriff Brody Carlton.
Once upon a time, being hauled against the taut, rippling body of her first crush would have had Rachael planning the wedding of the year. Now it spurs her to created Romanceaholics Anonymous, a twelve-step program for love addicts. Soon all of Valentine is divided as die-hard romantics clash with antilove cynics. But when Rachael starts fantasizing about a lust-filled affair with Brody, she goes against everything the program stands for. Should she protect her fragile heart...or find a way to have her wedding cake and eat it too?
subtexts: if Boehner gives in, the two parties can be married (wedding altar)
if the two parties get married, they can sacrifice America's children ( sacrificial altar)
THE AMERICAN PUBLIC WANTS THEM TO MARRY ! MAKE A DEAL! JUST DO IT!
That's how they brought it about. The wary, coy white male. tool of the rich, drone killer militarists, Zionists covers his ar$e by "showing where its at" -- ultimate decision, taken to the limit; "HE" defines the terms of the deal (NOT) SHE (<=Obama as mama). Now "we" are supposed to 'see' (<=narratize through group-fantasy metaphor) the entire thing as a lovers quarrel (layered over intra-familial squabble), calling for demands to MAKE UP! NOW!
Now we await news of whether "we" can be "saved" (<=sacrificed) as the Two Parties meet together this Saturday, at 11:11 am.
Boehner-Libous Republicans* (predicate on, represent) =* tokens of male spirituality.
OBAMA betokens the sacrificed sacrificers. A compromise in the middle
(He* IS an alter -- Good Prince of "gay" marriage at home; drone bomber of Afghan/Taliban marriages abroad. How can the same man be both things?
OBAMA =/= OBAMA
America's group-psychotic state, trying to cleanse itself by killing its way out of
2. Murdoch medIa ( .. .. position of consciousness: sensationalized, vulgar, manipulated by the MSM <- now calling attention to differences between themselves)
3, Israel/Islam (.. .. bombing Iran)
4. Bin Laden murder (.. .. .. rule of law v. state targeted assassination)
5. abortion (.. .. .. .. redefinition of fetuses as "the unborn")
6. MEA-DOMA (pivoting on marriage)
EVERYTHING* HEARD IN A SEXUAL WAY -- "same sex ,arriage" poisoning discourse from top-down -- media "news" coverage keeps thoughts and feelings connected to what "we" are, and the direction we are headed in,
7. 911
- Nat'l holiday, memorials, services
The local Gannett newspaper, Binghamton Press and Sun Bulletin, has had a letter to the editor calling for 911 to be made into a national holiday; followed by news that a memorial for those killed in the terrible event was under construction downtown.
However, to memorialize deaths caused by lies, when evidence of that fact is indisputable, is to glorify the suffering itself.
Moreover, the thought that this could be done deliberately (consciously), for that reason, undermines every other memorial shrine, on suspicion it came into existence the same way -- to replace criminality by glorified civic ceremony. It particularly undermines, and reverses, honor of Christianity as a religion, whenever its majesterium backs lying authority used to silence truth.
This outcome spirals out from "buying the contradiction": predicating positive civic ceremony on silenced voice of truth. The effect of this, grammatized into group discourse under names deserving respect and honor, is (in technical terms) to split off* accountability for deeds of the dark side; dump* (*i.e., projectively displace) responsibility for karmic feedback, re-played in consciousness as "enemy (=>enema) of the people" (thus creating the fantasy of 'poison container'); "Kill the Poisoned!" -- to cleanse the psyche. The outcome of predicating on self contradiction (S* and ~S*) correlates with the (1 . ~1.) 2 ... origin of fibonacci series as (1. + ~1.) = 2, where "2" predicates from the reversed starting point, and is in turn taken up as an S* into the grammar of higher order (predicates of predicates).
Application: The term "marriage", ambient noun-verb , is now used by NYMEA backers to predicate on what believers in Romans 1.27 of The Bible condemn on religious moral terms:
anal intercourse. For most families, I suppose mine was typical, the topic itself doesn't come up in polite conversation. It stands in existential contradiction to the content of marriage vows between husband and wife, creating a bond of psychic unity higher than sexuality, to which its offspring are duly dedicated. This is the 1. + ~1 contradictory starting point: sexual union of couples completing nature's narrative in the sex act, negated by sexual union of couples completing the sex act in a way that deviates from nature's narrative. Further predication on "Marriage", redefined to include contradiction of religious roots, as EQUAL
(1. + ~1) =2), under New York State law is an insult to the religious roots of the institution.
Note: if the fibonacci series is continued (1. + ~1.) +/= (2) + /= 3 .. = 5 .. = 8 = 13), a (non-Achemedian) spiral can be traced through a set of squared Fibonacci retangles, of the same geo-metrical proportions of spirals in nature. The seven Group-fantasy tokens (above) each trace a fibonacci spiral in TokenSpace, pivoting on a Text-Token Reversal in Sign-use.
*****
Persistent insistance on what is demonstrably wrong as right, pressed beyond rational response to facts, finally reaching a tipping point reversing the direction of whatever was positive, into something negative: doctors that sicken, teachers that misinform; use of words of truth to lie -- religiously, Satan's words from Christ's voice: the anti-Christ.
This last step defines the current soul reversal in re 6. ("same-sex marriage")
*****
(other: Cayce/Cayle Anthony -- killer mother
Leiby Kletxky -- dead, dismembered 8 yr old
Insanity closing in -- feel it
FIRST IN THE MIND (--ideas worked out to live by)
NEXT IN THE BODY
Body movement is entirely mechanical, proceeding from the vertebrate brain.
That's why snake-brain mentality controls body-movement independently of ideas, even feelings ("I watched in horror as...")
However, brains -1./3. link through hippocampal memory loops, bringing the form of mechanical movement under the influence of the +/- soul transform.
SAME SEX MARRIAGE AS SOCIAL ISSUE
1. The chief social issue raised by re-defining "mariage" to include same-sex unions
is not religious, though religious condemnation of homosexuality is explicitly taught in the Bible (cf. Romans 1.27), and gives those who follow it sufficient grounds for outcry (cf. Yehuda Levin)
It's philosophical The content the words bring to mind is intellectually incoherent.
Marriage is not just a text (word that can be redefined), it's a token ( . This double function
2. Once NYMEA passed, however, it becomes a religious issue, for the reasons it was religiously condemned now require examination as social factors. The possibility is that this condemnation, cultivated steadfastly, sincerely (and largely without rancor of any sort at all, from my knowledge of a rather broad swath of conservative (So. Bap.) religious experience).
By argument and feeling-state, I assert this is in fact the case.
The feeling state is from memory of what it was like growing up happy, normal, religious, and free from fear and prejudice; the thankfulness for that.
The argument is from depth psychology, Freud's instinct (libido) theory + Jungian Archetypes + L. deMause's fetal origins of history. Specifically, from the developmental p/o/v of sexual object-cathexis toward same, or other, genders. From this p/o/v, the outcomes of hetero- v. homo- sexual as a fixed personality/behavioral type are understood bio-psychologically, as the routing of charge-discharge neural connections in the body adapts to changing inner and outer conditions, within given hereditary limits (which some claim include determinants of the homosexual outcome -- 'born that way'). In any case, it is this outcome that is recognized as requiring explanation. Male bonds with female; in humans, Man Meets Woman -- whether its Rex and Regina,Tarzan and Jane, or just Moli and Obi -- that no more calls for explanation than blueness of sky (though there is one). It is the way it is, with life. What calls for explanation are the deviations (hermopodites, etc.).
Deviations can be classified as points in psychic functioning at which progress toward completion of the normal human reproductive cycle is deflected to an alternative line of development. Homosexuality is a deviation in psychosexual development explainable in various detail trough ''vicissitudes of instinct." What is predicated on in legal and social policy discourse as "sex", or "sexual relations", refers in actual fact to some personal biography of instinctual history. It is the history of marriage as a religious sacrament, given that Archetypes in religious language Square and Sublimate sexual instinct.
CONVICTION:
I FEEL I SHOULD JOIN THE PROTEST TO POINT THIS OUT -- IT SHOULD NOT BE UP TO THE RELIGIOUS TO DEFEND THE DEEP TRUTH THEY ARE PRESERVING.
3. The existential base for resisting inclusion of "same-sex" under "mariage" is
instinctual incompatibility* of the two forms of sexual union. Sexual love between those of same vs. opposite genders follow different development routes: from early childhood innocence, when all was symbolic and "once upon a time', through pre-adolecent fantasies, to post hormonal mentality (rounding off roughly from Freud). The split between genders of object-cathexis is seated in the personality in inter-parental/sibling relationships (assuming no serious abuse trauma occirs) worked through at this time
(*this can range from felt psychic revulsion to subtle resistances; pictures of men kissing will do it for many. Common in-group understanding of themselves, and each other, places great importance in the role of vulgar sex images in shaping inner object-cathexis.)
Argument so far: 1. As a sign-use, "same-sex marriage" is intellectually incoherent. What it purports to communicate cannot exist. (cf. mixed rules of the language game: "The bishop's deuce ? ") 2. The deviation from coherence awakens para-rational religious condemnation as having been silenced. 3. The para-rational religious condemnation expresses instinctual revulsion in spiritual (Archetypal) terms.
1. + 2. + 3. => Use of "Equality" for same-sex v. male-female re "marriage" places the developmental outcome of impulses toward deviancy, if encouraged and persisted in,
alongside and equal to the product of those walking nature's path. That cannot be consciously done.
WHY IS it done unconsciously? (motive: =>) It provides a mechanism by means of which "religious liberals" can forgive their own unconscious sex-guilt by 'forgiving' homosexuals theirs. They have allowed their religious development to be seduced by sexuality, giving up any existential grounds of making value judgments. As a position of consciousness, this subverts all appeals to square metaphysics with reason. By constructing an alternative psychohistorical narrative in which NY MARRIAGE EQUALITY ACT is predicated on, this group of "religious liberals" calls for acceptance of their sex guilt by the rest. Their intellectuals have defined themselves in opposition to the way social norms and nature have defined marriage, and in a way that requires the containing community to align (accept or reject). They have the right to believe it, but not for one minute assume anyone else can or ought to accept it as true. That is an irrational demand, proceeding from irrational motive, by irrational equalizer*mentality.
4. "EQUALITY" ploy PITCHES TO WHITE SEX GUILT .. allows PC 'tweaking' whenever "gay" or "same-sex marriage" are used to provoke RECALL(=>arousal of amygdalan memory content) WITH REACTION-FORMATION (<= forcing consciousness to react to any pre-conscious impulse to demur -- "What did you say? are you flirting with racism, anti-Semitism, mysogeny, now going over to homophobia?")
The religious don't have to stand for that. It reduces them to a level of psychosexual development long grown out of, obliging an "its OK" or "You threatning me?" response. But that is NYMEA's pitch to the unconscious. "A threat unless you agree."
SAME - SEX =/= MARRIAGE
<= narrative predicated on addiction to love -eating up your brain by over-loading all pivot-control Stopenders; forced ritualization of sex-love expression by those aggressively defending against sex-guilt/repugnance unconsciousle aimed at them.
TO CLEANSE THE PSYCHE
How coincidental is it ? that push has come to shove over the debt-deficit monetary crisis, on which America's longterm economic future pivots ... at the same time New York's Marriage Equality Act goes into effect. (=> plus these 5 other tokens, below, lying in the immediate foreground of the unconscious background.)
The unconscious psychohistorical aim
is eradication of all guilt-revulsion toward sex and sexuality in general. The deepest two layers of the unconscious background are: 1. birth (<-trauma, rebirth, treated elsewhere). 2. Oedipal stage of personality development, distributing pre-sexual love-cathexis toward/between parents; resulting in choices* later sealed by repression of the opposite, in communicating with others. This is the repressed content, going back to early childhood fears, infatuations and fantasies, that returns when conscious stress brings psychic regression. What we "go back to" (or comes back to us, in altered state) is "where we once began". Amygdalan memory links snake-to-soul brains continuing marsupial- mammals evolution (elephant memory: various animal species remember abusive or rewarding treatment and bond to, or in defense against, repetitions. Freud's instinct theory intersects here, because the amygdala will carry the earliest-formed, most enduring psycho-neural transformation, 'sealed under trauma'; that is, "first love" discharges of libido. Hippocampal memory, relating content mediated by learned sign-use,
"LEFT AT THE ALTAR ...TWICE"
-Dominating the flow of political/historical Group Process 7.22.'11
1. Debt-debit -- (pivoting on: "trickle down" economics -- THE DETAILS OF SACRIFICE)
7.23.11 - BOEHNER breaks off budget discussions with WH*
-- great MSM bleeping about "Tea Party" influence (<-constructed politicasl control tokening =>-layers of psychohistorical process => layers of sign-use: : Scott Monroe - "News and Blues" pre-'08. )
*betokens: cancellation of possibility of sharing assumptions allowing communication to be directed to a common goal. Timing: after passage of NYMEA, 2 days before implementation 7.24. Symbolism:
(OBAMA*)'s position: "left at the alter/altar twice (split/spin)" / Square / "shared sacrifice" / Square) / "same-sex marriage" (<= America's alter at the altar; same-sex marriage pre-emptively foregoes reproduction by sexual intercourse)
http://www.amazon.com/Addicted-Love-Wedding-Veil-Wishes/dp/0446502049
Product Description
Growing up in Valentine, Texas, can make anyone believe in happily ever after. But newly declared recovering romantic Rachael Henderson has decided that love stinks. After having not one but two grooms ditch her at the altar, she announces her disenchantment in an uncharacteristic act of rebellion. She feels liberated...until she's arrested by Sheriff Brody Carlton.
Once upon a time, being hauled against the taut, rippling body of her first crush would have had Rachael planning the wedding of the year. Now it spurs her to created Romanceaholics Anonymous, a twelve-step program for love addicts. Soon all of Valentine is divided as die-hard romantics clash with antilove cynics. But when Rachael starts fantasizing about a lust-filled affair with Brody, she goes against everything the program stands for. Should she protect her fragile heart...or find a way to have her wedding cake and eat it too?
subtexts: if Boehner gives in, the two parties can be married (wedding altar)
if the two parties get married, they can sacrifice America's children ( sacrificial altar)
THE AMERICAN PUBLIC WANTS THEM TO MARRY ! MAKE A DEAL! JUST DO IT!
That's how they brought it about. The wary, coy white male. tool of the rich, drone killer militarists, Zionists covers his ar$e by "showing where its at" -- ultimate decision, taken to the limit; "HE" defines the terms of the deal (NOT) SHE (<=Obama as mama). Now "we" are supposed to 'see' (<=narratize through group-fantasy metaphor) the entire thing as a lovers quarrel (layered over intra-familial squabble), calling for demands to MAKE UP! NOW!
Now we await news of whether "we" can be "saved" (<=sacrificed) as the Two Parties meet together this Saturday, at 11:11 am.
Boehner-Libous Republicans* (predicate on, represent) =* tokens of male spirituality.
OBAMA betokens the sacrificed sacrificers. A compromise in the middle
(He* IS an alter -- Good Prince of "gay" marriage at home; drone bomber of Afghan/Taliban marriages abroad. How can the same man be both things?
OBAMA =/= OBAMA
America's group-psychotic state, trying to cleanse itself by killing its way out of
2. Murdoch medIa ( .. .. position of consciousness: sensationalized, vulgar, manipulated by the MSM <- now calling attention to differences between themselves)
3, Israel/Islam (.. .. bombing Iran)
4. Bin Laden murder (.. .. .. rule of law v. state targeted assassination)
5. abortion (.. .. .. .. redefinition of fetuses as "the unborn")
6. MEA-DOMA (pivoting on marriage)
EVERYTHING* HEARD IN A SEXUAL WAY -- "same sex ,arriage" poisoning discourse from top-down -- media "news" coverage keeps thoughts and feelings connected to what "we" are, and the direction we are headed in,
7. 911
- Nat'l holiday, memorials, services
The local Gannett newspaper, Binghamton Press and Sun Bulletin, has had a letter to the editor calling for 911 to be made into a national holiday; followed by news that a memorial for those killed in the terrible event was under construction downtown.
However, to memorialize deaths caused by lies, when evidence of that fact is indisputable, is to glorify the suffering itself.
Moreover, the thought that this could be done deliberately (consciously), for that reason, undermines every other memorial shrine, on suspicion it came into existence the same way -- to replace criminality by glorified civic ceremony. It particularly undermines, and reverses, honor of Christianity as a religion, whenever its majesterium backs lying authority used to silence truth.
This outcome spirals out from "buying the contradiction": predicating positive civic ceremony on silenced voice of truth. The effect of this, grammatized into group discourse under names deserving respect and honor, is (in technical terms) to split off* accountability for deeds of the dark side; dump* (*i.e., projectively displace) responsibility for karmic feedback, re-played in consciousness as "enemy (=>enema) of the people" (thus creating the fantasy of 'poison container'); "Kill the Poisoned!" -- to cleanse the psyche. The outcome of predicating on self contradiction (S* and ~S*) correlates with the (1 . ~1.) 2 ... origin of fibonacci series as (1. + ~1.) = 2, where "2" predicates from the reversed starting point, and is in turn taken up as an S* into the grammar of higher order (predicates of predicates).
Application: The term "marriage", ambient noun-verb , is now used by NYMEA backers to predicate on what believers in Romans 1.27 of The Bible condemn on religious moral terms:
anal intercourse. For most families, I suppose mine was typical, the topic itself doesn't come up in polite conversation. It stands in existential contradiction to the content of marriage vows between husband and wife, creating a bond of psychic unity higher than sexuality, to which its offspring are duly dedicated. This is the 1. + ~1 contradictory starting point: sexual union of couples completing nature's narrative in the sex act, negated by sexual union of couples completing the sex act in a way that deviates from nature's narrative. Further predication on "Marriage", redefined to include contradiction of religious roots, as EQUAL
(1. + ~1) =2), under New York State law is an insult to the religious roots of the institution.
Note: if the fibonacci series is continued (1. + ~1.) +/= (2) + /= 3 .. = 5 .. = 8 = 13), a (non-Achemedian) spiral can be traced through a set of squared Fibonacci retangles, of the same geo-metrical proportions of spirals in nature. The seven Group-fantasy tokens (above) each trace a fibonacci spiral in TokenSpace, pivoting on a Text-Token Reversal in Sign-use.
*****
Persistent insistance on what is demonstrably wrong as right, pressed beyond rational response to facts, finally reaching a tipping point reversing the direction of whatever was positive, into something negative: doctors that sicken, teachers that misinform; use of words of truth to lie -- religiously, Satan's words from Christ's voice: the anti-Christ.
This last step defines the current soul reversal in re 6. ("same-sex marriage")
*****
(other: Cayce/Cayle Anthony -- killer mother
Leiby Kletxky -- dead, dismembered 8 yr old
Insanity closing in -- feel it
FIRST IN THE MIND (--ideas worked out to live by)
NEXT IN THE BODY
Body movement is entirely mechanical, proceeding from the vertebrate brain.
That's why snake-brain mentality controls body-movement independently of ideas, even feelings ("I watched in horror as...")
However, brains -1./3. link through hippocampal memory loops, bringing the form of mechanical movement under the influence of the +/- soul transform.
SAME SEX MARRIAGE AS SOCIAL ISSUE
1. The chief social issue raised by re-defining "mariage" to include same-sex unions
is not religious, though religious condemnation of homosexuality is explicitly taught in the Bible (cf. Romans 1.27), and gives those who follow it sufficient grounds for outcry (cf. Yehuda Levin)
It's philosophical The content the words bring to mind is intellectually incoherent.
Marriage is not just a text (word that can be redefined), it's a token ( . This double function
2. Once NYMEA passed, however, it becomes a religious issue, for the reasons it was religiously condemned now require examination as social factors. The possibility is that this condemnation, cultivated steadfastly, sincerely (and largely without rancor of any sort at all, from my knowledge of a rather broad swath of conservative (So. Bap.) religious experience).
By argument and feeling-state, I assert this is in fact the case.
The feeling state is from memory of what it was like growing up happy, normal, religious, and free from fear and prejudice; the thankfulness for that.
The argument is from depth psychology, Freud's instinct (libido) theory + Jungian Archetypes + L. deMause's fetal origins of history. Specifically, from the developmental p/o/v of sexual object-cathexis toward same, or other, genders. From this p/o/v, the outcomes of hetero- v. homo- sexual as a fixed personality/behavioral type are understood bio-psychologically, as the routing of charge-discharge neural connections in the body adapts to changing inner and outer conditions, within given hereditary limits (which some claim include determinants of the homosexual outcome -- 'born that way'). In any case, it is this outcome that is recognized as requiring explanation. Male bonds with female; in humans, Man Meets Woman -- whether its Rex and Regina,Tarzan and Jane, or just Moli and Obi -- that no more calls for explanation than blueness of sky (though there is one). It is the way it is, with life. What calls for explanation are the deviations (hermopodites, etc.).
Deviations can be classified as points in psychic functioning at which progress toward completion of the normal human reproductive cycle is deflected to an alternative line of development. Homosexuality is a deviation in psychosexual development explainable in various detail trough ''vicissitudes of instinct." What is predicated on in legal and social policy discourse as "sex", or "sexual relations", refers in actual fact to some personal biography of instinctual history. It is the history of marriage as a religious sacrament, given that Archetypes in religious language Square and Sublimate sexual instinct.
CONVICTION:
I FEEL I SHOULD JOIN THE PROTEST TO POINT THIS OUT -- IT SHOULD NOT BE UP TO THE RELIGIOUS TO DEFEND THE DEEP TRUTH THEY ARE PRESERVING.
3. The existential base for resisting inclusion of "same-sex" under "mariage" is
instinctual incompatibility* of the two forms of sexual union. Sexual love between those of same vs. opposite genders follow different development routes: from early childhood innocence, when all was symbolic and "once upon a time', through pre-adolecent fantasies, to post hormonal mentality (rounding off roughly from Freud). The split between genders of object-cathexis is seated in the personality in inter-parental/sibling relationships (assuming no serious abuse trauma occirs) worked through at this time
(*this can range from felt psychic revulsion to subtle resistances; pictures of men kissing will do it for many. Common in-group understanding of themselves, and each other, places great importance in the role of vulgar sex images in shaping inner object-cathexis.)
Argument so far: 1. As a sign-use, "same-sex marriage" is intellectually incoherent. What it purports to communicate cannot exist. (cf. mixed rules of the language game: "The bishop's deuce ? ") 2. The deviation from coherence awakens para-rational religious condemnation as having been silenced. 3. The para-rational religious condemnation expresses instinctual revulsion in spiritual (Archetypal) terms.
1. + 2. + 3. => Use of "Equality" for same-sex v. male-female re "marriage" places the developmental outcome of impulses toward deviancy, if encouraged and persisted in,
alongside and equal to the product of those walking nature's path. That cannot be consciously done.
WHY IS it done unconsciously? (motive: =>) It provides a mechanism by means of which "religious liberals" can forgive their own unconscious sex-guilt by 'forgiving' homosexuals theirs. They have allowed their religious development to be seduced by sexuality, giving up any existential grounds of making value judgments. As a position of consciousness, this subverts all appeals to square metaphysics with reason. By constructing an alternative psychohistorical narrative in which NY MARRIAGE EQUALITY ACT is predicated on, this group of "religious liberals" calls for acceptance of their sex guilt by the rest. Their intellectuals have defined themselves in opposition to the way social norms and nature have defined marriage, and in a way that requires the containing community to align (accept or reject). They have the right to believe it, but not for one minute assume anyone else can or ought to accept it as true. That is an irrational demand, proceeding from irrational motive, by irrational equalizer*mentality.
4. "EQUALITY" ploy PITCHES TO WHITE SEX GUILT .. allows PC 'tweaking' whenever "gay" or "same-sex marriage" are used to provoke RECALL(=>arousal of amygdalan memory content) WITH REACTION-FORMATION (<= forcing consciousness to react to any pre-conscious impulse to demur -- "What did you say? are you flirting with racism, anti-Semitism, mysogeny, now going over to homophobia?")
The religious don't have to stand for that. It reduces them to a level of psychosexual development long grown out of, obliging an "its OK" or "You threatning me?" response. But that is NYMEA's pitch to the unconscious. "A threat unless you agree."
Tuesday, July 12, 2011
Theory of Evil
THE THEORY OF EVIL
I.
--When one of the initial members of the fibonacci series gets turned into its opposite: 1 - 1 is replaced by ~1 - 1 as a starting point. In applied terms, this could be a DNA-RNA mix-up, affecting some psychic mis-match. Once a token gets "flipped over on its other side", reversing the polarity of conscious positions through the text, the negation present in the beginning ("original sin") may be passed up the line of predicates, accumulating potential for genetic (or convulsive) mutation, if a tipping point is reached.
A contradictory starting point would begin an involuting, downward spiral, even as the series progressed from ( ) -2-3-5-8-13. This would be the sequence of psychic energy sufficiently formed to bring dream/fantasy conent (with trauma) under organized qualitative content of an embodied self. (The third fibonnaci number, 2, corresponds to the third token type of S*.) "Darkness", when it is not a traumatic obliteration of consciousness, is a content brought in through dreams (and other hypnogogic altered states), and may be accented or diminished, sustained or put aside in development, in relating to others at higher S* levels. This darkness may 'spread from below upward', a process biblical group-fantasy squares under the image of Snakebrain relating to Eve.
II. From Vietnam to Stephen Saland (NY State Senator, R. Poughkeepsie)
-the karmic narrative of his switch (from opposing to voting for New York Marriage Equality Act).
--For the irony impaired: this most smashing VICTORY! of left-liberal political maneuvering is culminated by one of the Republican's own party members, a Conservative Jew (self-described) previously opposed to same-sex marriage on religious grounds. The opposition to NYMEA within the system was in the Republican Conference, led by Sen. Tom Libous, R.-Binghamton. The pro-"gay" forces are hailed by many as continuing the spirit of the 60's protest movement. However, the inner contradiction of "same-sex marriage", if spelled out (~S/S*)^, actually deconstructs The Dark side of The Unconscious latent in the 60's. It is that "one step too far", the pushing through of which reverses psychic valency from positive (expanding toward completion) to negative (involuting to nothing). This shows how "the Left" converts into "the Right" through (~S/S*)^ (the contradiction/reversal). Oppositely, "the Right", or Republicanism, whose authoritarian militarism originally contained The Dark, if the process is traced from that side, converts into the superior moral position vis a vis "The Left". These are two sides of a psychesemiotic vortex, one involuting (turning on itself), the other evoluting (expanding indefinitely). I imagine them as pivoting around a center intersecting inverted cone shaped barber pole stripes, one spiraling in, the other spiraling out. However, it is not necessary to reach this level of diagramatic complexity to trace the effects of grammatizing the contradiction. One gets "Adam and Steve" turning up as bon mot for Genesis. As predication on an irrational construct expands through TokenSpace, it breeds others. That is the Theory of Evil, connecting it with snakebrain function.
Summary: In opposing "same-sex marriage", Libous and the Republicans are taking the place of 60's protestors of the Vietnam war, standing up against imposed irrationality.
THE BIG REVERSAL In proclaiming "same-sex marriage" a victory over Right Wing authoritarian militarism, the Left-Liberal clacque has gone over to the authoritarian militarist side of Vietnam war days.
Nothing could show this more clearly than The Nation magazine's "Coming Out For Change", by Richard Kim 7.18.'11 p. 6f.
"If Americans go past the shame and isolation... they might well tell their stories with the same moral clarity as the gay movement (sic), and ...might ask the people around them, President Obama, the Democrats, the Republicans, the entire damn system the same question: Are you with us, or against us?"
Against. Partly, and sufficiently for rational justifdication, for the act of framing this exclusionaly situation, after making a virtue of predicating of a contradiction. For that is what "same-sex marriage" is, as a sign-use (meme, text-token construct) now pervading collective TokenSpace. Marriage, tautologically connoting connubial union, conjoins, for males, with anal intercourse as subtext. The imagery is unmistakably communicated. That's how they do it. If "husband-wife", related in marriage by connubial union, is replaced by "husband-husband", the image of penis-vaginal penetration is replaced by that of penis-anal penetration, as modes of sexual intercourse. This replacement was not sought for, nor welcomed by, those for whom marriage already had the meaning which the other mode of sexual relations did not qualify. The imposed mental imagery is irrational; the fact that it is of sexual deviance comes in next as a separate being-insult.
For that is what it is. The language of Romans 1.27 is perhaps as explicit in expressing religious repulsion as any text could be. "...Men with men committing what is shameful ...". It would be perverse not to take this as referring to sodomy. Thus, what Kim calls "the moral clarity of the gay movement" is actually religious desecration.
Morever, the partucular way this abominable New York Marriage Equality Act came about illustrates the same reversal. It turns out that one of the last key hold-outs was a Conservative Republican Jew from Poughkeepsie, Stephen Saland by name, whose flip-flop vote when the chips were down made sure "gay"-ness prevailed. Throwing his religious identity (Agadath Israel and Orthodox Union Jews opposed it) under the rainbow bus.
It was not necessary that the psychic polarity degenerate to the point of irresoluable dynamic opposition, but The Left absolutized it. For the irony-impaired: juxtaposition of Cuomo-Saland homosexual Victory! in New York...with claims some make of it as continuing anti-Vietname war 60's Freedom movement ... describes a Dark Hole at the centre of an involuting spiral in TokenSpace.
I.
--When one of the initial members of the fibonacci series gets turned into its opposite: 1 - 1 is replaced by ~1 - 1 as a starting point. In applied terms, this could be a DNA-RNA mix-up, affecting some psychic mis-match. Once a token gets "flipped over on its other side", reversing the polarity of conscious positions through the text, the negation present in the beginning ("original sin") may be passed up the line of predicates, accumulating potential for genetic (or convulsive) mutation, if a tipping point is reached.
A contradictory starting point would begin an involuting, downward spiral, even as the series progressed from ( ) -2-3-5-8-13. This would be the sequence of psychic energy sufficiently formed to bring dream/fantasy conent (with trauma) under organized qualitative content of an embodied self. (The third fibonnaci number, 2, corresponds to the third token type of S*.) "Darkness", when it is not a traumatic obliteration of consciousness, is a content brought in through dreams (and other hypnogogic altered states), and may be accented or diminished, sustained or put aside in development, in relating to others at higher S* levels. This darkness may 'spread from below upward', a process biblical group-fantasy squares under the image of Snakebrain relating to Eve.
II. From Vietnam to Stephen Saland (NY State Senator, R. Poughkeepsie)
-the karmic narrative of his switch (from opposing to voting for New York Marriage Equality Act).
--For the irony impaired: this most smashing VICTORY! of left-liberal political maneuvering is culminated by one of the Republican's own party members, a Conservative Jew (self-described) previously opposed to same-sex marriage on religious grounds. The opposition to NYMEA within the system was in the Republican Conference, led by Sen. Tom Libous, R.-Binghamton. The pro-"gay" forces are hailed by many as continuing the spirit of the 60's protest movement. However, the inner contradiction of "same-sex marriage", if spelled out (~S/S*)^, actually deconstructs The Dark side of The Unconscious latent in the 60's. It is that "one step too far", the pushing through of which reverses psychic valency from positive (expanding toward completion) to negative (involuting to nothing). This shows how "the Left" converts into "the Right" through (~S/S*)^ (the contradiction/reversal). Oppositely, "the Right", or Republicanism, whose authoritarian militarism originally contained The Dark, if the process is traced from that side, converts into the superior moral position vis a vis "The Left". These are two sides of a psychesemiotic vortex, one involuting (turning on itself), the other evoluting (expanding indefinitely). I imagine them as pivoting around a center intersecting inverted cone shaped barber pole stripes, one spiraling in, the other spiraling out. However, it is not necessary to reach this level of diagramatic complexity to trace the effects of grammatizing the contradiction. One gets "Adam and Steve" turning up as bon mot for Genesis. As predication on an irrational construct expands through TokenSpace, it breeds others. That is the Theory of Evil, connecting it with snakebrain function.
Summary: In opposing "same-sex marriage", Libous and the Republicans are taking the place of 60's protestors of the Vietnam war, standing up against imposed irrationality.
THE BIG REVERSAL In proclaiming "same-sex marriage" a victory over Right Wing authoritarian militarism, the Left-Liberal clacque has gone over to the authoritarian militarist side of Vietnam war days.
Nothing could show this more clearly than The Nation magazine's "Coming Out For Change", by Richard Kim 7.18.'11 p. 6f.
"If Americans go past the shame and isolation... they might well tell their stories with the same moral clarity as the gay movement (sic), and ...might ask the people around them, President Obama, the Democrats, the Republicans, the entire damn system the same question: Are you with us, or against us?"
Against. Partly, and sufficiently for rational justifdication, for the act of framing this exclusionaly situation, after making a virtue of predicating of a contradiction. For that is what "same-sex marriage" is, as a sign-use (meme, text-token construct) now pervading collective TokenSpace. Marriage, tautologically connoting connubial union, conjoins, for males, with anal intercourse as subtext. The imagery is unmistakably communicated. That's how they do it. If "husband-wife", related in marriage by connubial union, is replaced by "husband-husband", the image of penis-vaginal penetration is replaced by that of penis-anal penetration, as modes of sexual intercourse. This replacement was not sought for, nor welcomed by, those for whom marriage already had the meaning which the other mode of sexual relations did not qualify. The imposed mental imagery is irrational; the fact that it is of sexual deviance comes in next as a separate being-insult.
For that is what it is. The language of Romans 1.27 is perhaps as explicit in expressing religious repulsion as any text could be. "...Men with men committing what is shameful ...". It would be perverse not to take this as referring to sodomy. Thus, what Kim calls "the moral clarity of the gay movement" is actually religious desecration.
Morever, the partucular way this abominable New York Marriage Equality Act came about illustrates the same reversal. It turns out that one of the last key hold-outs was a Conservative Republican Jew from Poughkeepsie, Stephen Saland by name, whose flip-flop vote when the chips were down made sure "gay"-ness prevailed. Throwing his religious identity (Agadath Israel and Orthodox Union Jews opposed it) under the rainbow bus.
It was not necessary that the psychic polarity degenerate to the point of irresoluable dynamic opposition, but The Left absolutized it. For the irony-impaired: juxtaposition of Cuomo-Saland homosexual Victory! in New York...with claims some make of it as continuing anti-Vietname war 60's Freedom movement ... describes a Dark Hole at the centre of an involuting spiral in TokenSpace.
Saturday, July 2, 2011
Straight Hate and DOR
STRAIGHT HATE
DORSettling the Onus Argument
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/01/opinion/01fri4.html?_r=1&ref=todayspaper Editorial content at bottom of page A18 hardcopy.
Christine Quinn, the speaker of the New York City Council, is one of the state’s most powerful politicians and the nation’s most prominent openly gay officials. On Charlie Rose’s program earlier this week, she spoke of the legalization of same-sex marriage in personal terms. (Ms. Quinn plans to marry Kim Catullo in New York in 2012.)
“The vote: “That stigma of being left out of this enormous important institution was gone. And it was just amazing. You felt really really kind of lifted up in a way and freed in a way.”
The pain of exclusion: Before, “the law actually pointed a finger at people like me and Kim and said you’re less than. Your family isn’t as good. You can say that doesn’t bother you, but, of course, it does.”
Their fathers: “Kim and I both lost our moms when we were both girls. My mom died of cancer, and Kim’s died of cancer. Mine died in ’84 and Kim’s in ’85. I want those two men to be able to go and dance and be at their daughters’ wedding. They’re 84 and 85 and, God willing, they will be with me for a long time.”
The broader message: “Think of a child somewhere in New York State, or anywhere in the country who is in their room watching TV. They see this happen. They know they’re gay. They think they’re gay. They can’t tell their parents. They’re terrified. They may not know another gay person. And they see New York State, New York just say that gay families are the same as straight families. That’s something that child will hold on to when they’re bullied, hold on to when their parents don’t accept them.”
CRITIQUE
Christine Quinn's position is pampered quasi-paranoid narcissistic
anti-straight bigotry. She suffers from the delusion that prior to 6.24, she stood aggreived under the old law: " “the law actually pointed a finger at people like me and Kim and said you’re less than. Your family isn’t as good. You can say that doesn’t bother you, but, of course, it does.”
But that is NY minute pop cult flapdoodle.
Everyone, I suppose, has an anti-authoritarian gene that projects aggression onto dutiful law enforcement officials, often unwarranted. That's the infantile pre-Oedipal group-fantasy thread Quinn is tugging on here. "The law" didn't actually point a finger at people like her and Kim and call them "less than." They regarded themselves as "less than", and projected the anti-cathectic feeling they entertained, thereunto, onto "the law" as a punitive (Repressive Father entity) behind the oppression. When they act it out politically, it becomes passive-aggessive psychosis, possibly the most dangerous state-condition the psyche degenerates to, expecting all to "see and understand".
Here's Quinn after the vote: “That stigma of being left out of this enormous important institution was gone. And it was just amazing. You felt really really kind of lifted up in a way and freed in a way.” Never mind that this 'enormous important institution' got that way by a route which her arrogance obliges her to condemn as exclusory. "The pain of exclusion"? As if the roots of collective humanity's most sacred experience were to be seen from the side of unions it "excluded." And who would have thought that not just this pair, but multitudes of pairs of women living together were getting mistreated! WHY DIDN'T ANY ONE SAY ANYTHING? Why did it take some gutsy rich Republican "gay" cohorts to knife the party apparatus in the back to free the suffering womenfolk? Oh the guilt she and Kim must feel for not doing more. And as for homophobic leaning fence sitters? Shame, shame on them for not doing as much.
*****
Having PREVIOUSLY explained
The ef..KingA--h-- gene (claimed discovery)
The AnusOnus (clarifying who's getting the shaft from the "gay marriage" bill. ..
now... the metaphysics of
STRAIGHT HATE (incurred by deviance projected as normal)
Not to hate evil is a metaphysical insult to love.
This leaves open the question whether "gay marriage" is evil.
What did the snake in Garden of Eden tell Eve? Was Aleister Crowly the Beast practicing sex magick?
I who once said "I Do" now dare do it again. Not just for myself, family, religious tradition*
(*West Texas Southern Baptist, college Baylor, U. of Wisconsin graduate scool in philosophy the 50-60's)
But for :
-Me (again)-- for taking away friends
-as American -- for taking away peace between married couples and homosexuals. This peace* is American children's birthright through its liberal Motherhood, as a transcendental Archetype of early developmental years. It* sets the existential tonality of color of her childhood history. Now it has racheted the "equal access for everybody" argument up past its turning point. It's leading liberal idea, that each should have access to all forms of happiness, is taken to psychosexual extremes, whereupon it reverses direction of development by claiming "equality" of the differentiated with the undifferentiated. That is experienced as hate by homophiles, because it surrounds and 'pressures' them; keeps them 'in the closet'. The whole hate thing, apart from actual visceral revulsion many have more or less of at different times, stems at bottom from the instinctive reaction this passive-aggressive position provokes.
-as global citizen: surplanting America/Earth Mother birthright => DOR clouds over Fukushima, fallout in Philadelphia. Deadly Orgone Radiation forms when the energy binding particles in the nuclei of atoms is released, and binds with the subtle cosmic energy W. Reich called 'orgone', a conceptual extension of Freud's sex-instinct (libido) theory. DOR clouds attack the essence-energy of life itself, having the effect of shrinking chloroform-seeking tendrils and 'sprouts' of life on earth. Delicate things, requiring special balanced rhythms to grow and reproduce, shrivel and die off as species. But withdrawal of love in the human species begins, or is intimately associated with, 'repression' of the sexual instinct, blocking the flow of libido to its hard-wired satisfactory completion. These psychic ends of desire-fulfillment get looped and tied together, after birth and childhood, in the Oedipal and following stages, in which The Mother is the object-cathexis replacing the Nurturant Placenta. "She", as a position of consciousness, emotionally contains 'the family' as those She loves. Overrlaying continuation of womb-placental origins of "Fetal Happiness", this position morphs into: "Sanctuary", "Church", "school," "state", "nation", "world", as out-ward spiralling mother-love containers (in a completed life trajectory).
In Freudian terms -- taken from his work but not attributing these exact views to the psychoanalyst himself -- hate is instinctual revulsion to substitution of one love- object for another, originally loved, one. The child's first loved object is its mother, or whatever substitutes as nurturing caretaker. It is now known that the
mothers' role psychologically overlays and continues that of the placental function, with good-bad moods alternating the way the fetus was alternately nurtured and "punished" or "pressured" in the womb. After conception, human development unfolds through the stages of embryo, fetus, birth, infancy, childhood, adolescence, adulthood, neuro-psychically. This explains why tinkering with the intricate, intimate, implacable network of terms
Note: 1. much more could be said in refutation of the "non-inclusion is exclusion' argument. It clearly can't be sustained. For example, sports teams don't exclude those who lack qualifications, skills, or ability to play on the First Team in competition with others, and it would be irrational for those not included to feel "excluded."
2. I have elsewhere deconstructed the instinctive revulsion response called "hate", used in context of early Freudianism, this way: the aggressive vehemence implied by its use derives from attempt to "fill the hole", or "remedy the loss" left in the psyche of those whose Mother (<=first libidinal Object Casthexis) has been taken away, defiled (as our soul), substituted for, reversed from loving-to-hating ("Big Government!" "I want my country back!" ) It is violent withdrawal from the pain of MotherTorture, screaming with contorted face into the mirror of Her reflection.
3. The words "same sex marriage" (sometime written with the hyphen "same-sex marriage") deconstructs directly, for males, to "ceremonially sanctioned anal intercourse." Apart from oral-penis contact, that is the explicit subtext of consummation of "same sex marriage." It is not a pretty sight, for many, I'm pretty sure I'm not speaking only for myself in saying it's not a pretty sight. Less than that: for, that part of Mother retained as Holy, from which each one born of woman on earth emerged, and to which penetration returns in sexual copulation, has been substituted for by the Other -- the anus. The devlopmental process that turns love into hate pivots on this ambiguity. (cf judge Shreiber's hallucinogenic transform into helpless subject of All Powerful Father God importuning him in the night with "voluptuousities", to rebirth a new, superior breed of men.) t
DORSettling the Onus Argument
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/01/opinion/01fri4.html?_r=1&ref=todayspaper Editorial content at bottom of page A18 hardcopy.
Christine Quinn, the speaker of the New York City Council, is one of the state’s most powerful politicians and the nation’s most prominent openly gay officials. On Charlie Rose’s program earlier this week, she spoke of the legalization of same-sex marriage in personal terms. (Ms. Quinn plans to marry Kim Catullo in New York in 2012.)
“The vote: “That stigma of being left out of this enormous important institution was gone. And it was just amazing. You felt really really kind of lifted up in a way and freed in a way.”
The pain of exclusion: Before, “the law actually pointed a finger at people like me and Kim and said you’re less than. Your family isn’t as good. You can say that doesn’t bother you, but, of course, it does.”
Their fathers: “Kim and I both lost our moms when we were both girls. My mom died of cancer, and Kim’s died of cancer. Mine died in ’84 and Kim’s in ’85. I want those two men to be able to go and dance and be at their daughters’ wedding. They’re 84 and 85 and, God willing, they will be with me for a long time.”
The broader message: “Think of a child somewhere in New York State, or anywhere in the country who is in their room watching TV. They see this happen. They know they’re gay. They think they’re gay. They can’t tell their parents. They’re terrified. They may not know another gay person. And they see New York State, New York just say that gay families are the same as straight families. That’s something that child will hold on to when they’re bullied, hold on to when their parents don’t accept them.”
CRITIQUE
Christine Quinn's position is pampered quasi-paranoid narcissistic
anti-straight bigotry. She suffers from the delusion that prior to 6.24, she stood aggreived under the old law: " “the law actually pointed a finger at people like me and Kim and said you’re less than. Your family isn’t as good. You can say that doesn’t bother you, but, of course, it does.”
But that is NY minute pop cult flapdoodle.
Everyone, I suppose, has an anti-authoritarian gene that projects aggression onto dutiful law enforcement officials, often unwarranted. That's the infantile pre-Oedipal group-fantasy thread Quinn is tugging on here. "The law" didn't actually point a finger at people like her and Kim and call them "less than." They regarded themselves as "less than", and projected the anti-cathectic feeling they entertained, thereunto, onto "the law" as a punitive (Repressive Father entity) behind the oppression. When they act it out politically, it becomes passive-aggessive psychosis, possibly the most dangerous state-condition the psyche degenerates to, expecting all to "see and understand".
Here's Quinn after the vote: “That stigma of being left out of this enormous important institution was gone. And it was just amazing. You felt really really kind of lifted up in a way and freed in a way.” Never mind that this 'enormous important institution' got that way by a route which her arrogance obliges her to condemn as exclusory. "The pain of exclusion"? As if the roots of collective humanity's most sacred experience were to be seen from the side of unions it "excluded." And who would have thought that not just this pair, but multitudes of pairs of women living together were getting mistreated! WHY DIDN'T ANY ONE SAY ANYTHING? Why did it take some gutsy rich Republican "gay" cohorts to knife the party apparatus in the back to free the suffering womenfolk? Oh the guilt she and Kim must feel for not doing more. And as for homophobic leaning fence sitters? Shame, shame on them for not doing as much.
*****
Having PREVIOUSLY explained
The ef..KingA--h-- gene (claimed discovery)
The AnusOnus (clarifying who's getting the shaft from the "gay marriage" bill. ..
now... the metaphysics of
STRAIGHT HATE (incurred by deviance projected as normal)
Not to hate evil is a metaphysical insult to love.
This leaves open the question whether "gay marriage" is evil.
What did the snake in Garden of Eden tell Eve? Was Aleister Crowly the Beast practicing sex magick?
I who once said "I Do" now dare do it again. Not just for myself, family, religious tradition*
(*West Texas Southern Baptist, college Baylor, U. of Wisconsin graduate scool in philosophy the 50-60's)
But for :
-Me (again)-- for taking away friends
-as American -- for taking away peace between married couples and homosexuals. This peace* is American children's birthright through its liberal Motherhood, as a transcendental Archetype of early developmental years. It* sets the existential tonality of color of her childhood history. Now it has racheted the "equal access for everybody" argument up past its turning point. It's leading liberal idea, that each should have access to all forms of happiness, is taken to psychosexual extremes, whereupon it reverses direction of development by claiming "equality" of the differentiated with the undifferentiated. That is experienced as hate by homophiles, because it surrounds and 'pressures' them; keeps them 'in the closet'. The whole hate thing, apart from actual visceral revulsion many have more or less of at different times, stems at bottom from the instinctive reaction this passive-aggressive position provokes.
-as global citizen: surplanting America/Earth Mother birthright => DOR clouds over Fukushima, fallout in Philadelphia. Deadly Orgone Radiation forms when the energy binding particles in the nuclei of atoms is released, and binds with the subtle cosmic energy W. Reich called 'orgone', a conceptual extension of Freud's sex-instinct (libido) theory. DOR clouds attack the essence-energy of life itself, having the effect of shrinking chloroform-seeking tendrils and 'sprouts' of life on earth. Delicate things, requiring special balanced rhythms to grow and reproduce, shrivel and die off as species. But withdrawal of love in the human species begins, or is intimately associated with, 'repression' of the sexual instinct, blocking the flow of libido to its hard-wired satisfactory completion. These psychic ends of desire-fulfillment get looped and tied together, after birth and childhood, in the Oedipal and following stages, in which The Mother is the object-cathexis replacing the Nurturant Placenta. "She", as a position of consciousness, emotionally contains 'the family' as those She loves. Overrlaying continuation of womb-placental origins of "Fetal Happiness", this position morphs into: "Sanctuary", "Church", "school," "state", "nation", "world", as out-ward spiralling mother-love containers (in a completed life trajectory).
In Freudian terms -- taken from his work but not attributing these exact views to the psychoanalyst himself -- hate is instinctual revulsion to substitution of one love- object for another, originally loved, one. The child's first loved object is its mother, or whatever substitutes as nurturing caretaker. It is now known that the
mothers' role psychologically overlays and continues that of the placental function, with good-bad moods alternating the way the fetus was alternately nurtured and "punished" or "pressured" in the womb. After conception, human development unfolds through the stages of embryo, fetus, birth, infancy, childhood, adolescence, adulthood, neuro-psychically. This explains why tinkering with the intricate, intimate, implacable network of terms
Note: 1. much more could be said in refutation of the "non-inclusion is exclusion' argument. It clearly can't be sustained. For example, sports teams don't exclude those who lack qualifications, skills, or ability to play on the First Team in competition with others, and it would be irrational for those not included to feel "excluded."
2. I have elsewhere deconstructed the instinctive revulsion response called "hate", used in context of early Freudianism, this way: the aggressive vehemence implied by its use derives from attempt to "fill the hole", or "remedy the loss" left in the psyche of those whose Mother (<=first libidinal Object Casthexis) has been taken away, defiled (as our soul), substituted for, reversed from loving-to-hating ("Big Government!" "I want my country back!" ) It is violent withdrawal from the pain of MotherTorture, screaming with contorted face into the mirror of Her reflection.
3. The words "same sex marriage" (sometime written with the hyphen "same-sex marriage") deconstructs directly, for males, to "ceremonially sanctioned anal intercourse." Apart from oral-penis contact, that is the explicit subtext of consummation of "same sex marriage." It is not a pretty sight, for many, I'm pretty sure I'm not speaking only for myself in saying it's not a pretty sight. Less than that: for, that part of Mother retained as Holy, from which each one born of woman on earth emerged, and to which penetration returns in sexual copulation, has been substituted for by the Other -- the anus. The devlopmental process that turns love into hate pivots on this ambiguity. (cf judge Shreiber's hallucinogenic transform into helpless subject of All Powerful Father God importuning him in the night with "voluptuousities", to rebirth a new, superior breed of men.) t
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)